Public memory fifty years after the assassination of an inconvenient intellectual
Abstract: The dynamics and uncertainties that still surround the death of Pier Paolo Pasolini, which occurred at the Idroscalo of Ostia in 1975, remain at the center of public and scholarly debate. The judicial reconstruction, which attributed responsibility solely to Pino Pelosi, has long shown numerous inconsistencies that fuel the hypothesis of an ambush carried out by multiple individuals and of possible political motives. Fifty years after the assassination, Pasolini continues to stand as an intellectual and civic reference point, while the unresolved questions about his death continue to challenge collective memory. This article also documents the public commemorations held fifty years after his passing.
Keywords: #Pasolini #PierPaoloPasolini #Pasolini50anni #CivilMemory #DeniedJustice #PasoliniCase #IdroscaloDiOstia #HistoricalTruth #JudicialTruth #ItalianCulture #UncomfortableIntellectual #CivicEngagement #FreedomOfThought #RagazziDiVita #PasoliniPetrolio #ItalianMystery #ContemporaryHistory #PublicEthics #SearchForTruth #EthicaSocietas #EthicaSocietasRivista #ScientificJournal #HumanSciences #SocialSciences #EthicaSocietasUpli
THE TRAGIC DEATH
On the night between November 1 and 2, 1975, at the Idroscalo in Ostia, one of the most controversial crimes in Italian history took place: the assassination of Pier Paolo Pasolini. The body of the poet, filmmaker, and intellectual was found in the early morning hours—beaten, bloodied, and run over by his own car. A brutal scene that shocked the nation and that, fifty years later, continues to raise unresolved questions.
According to the official judicial version, the sole perpetrator was said to be the young Pino Pelosi, a seventeen-year-old known as “la Rana” (“the Frog”), who confessed to the murder only to later retract his admission. The alleged motive involved an argument that escalated into violence. Pelosi was convicted, yet from the very beginning the reconstruction appeared flawed: too many injuries on Pasolini’s body to have been inflicted by a single assailant, too many inconsistencies in the timeline, too many details incompatible with an improvised brawl.
Pasolini was one of the most courageous, uncomfortable, and lucid voices in the Italian cultural landscape. He openly criticized political power, the bourgeoisie, consumerist degeneration, and mass conformity. At the time, he was working on the novel Petrolio, grappling with explosive themes concerning the intersections between politics, economic power, and criminal networks. Many believe that his intellectual activity may have antagonized influential circles.
Over the years, numerous elements have supported the hypothesis of a premeditated murder carried out by multiple individuals:
-
the extreme violence of the beating, hardly compatible with a single attacker;
-
signs of a prolonged and systematic assault;
-
Pelosi’s retractions, in which he claimed not to have killed Pasolini but to have witnessed a coordinated group attack;
-
contradictory testimonies and missing or unanalyzed evidence;
-
the lack of a thorough investigation into potential political motivations.
Many scholars, friends, and collaborators of Pasolini have described the court ruling as a compromise that failed to bring clarity to the true circumstances of his death. Repeated calls have been made to reopen the investigation, supported by new scientific analyses of the evidence, yet without definitive results.
A TIMELESS INTELLECTUAL
Fifty years have now passed since that cursed day: it was November 2, 1975, when the body of Pier Paolo Pasolini was found, brutally murdered. He lay in the mud of the Idroscalo in Ostia, beaten and then run over by his own car. Italian culture thus lost a poet, a filmmaker, and a writer of rare sensitivity—one of the most lucid and fierce consciences of the twentieth century, as Alberto Moravia would write of him.
An idol to generations of nonconformist, anti-bourgeois, and socially critical thinkers, always aligned with the oppressed, Pasolini remains to this day an essential intellectual reference point, not only for his artistic production but also for his profound, unschematized, and unassimilated thought. For all that he represented—and continues to represent for us— in 1987, in his honor, we decided to give his name to one of our children.
At the place where Pasolini’s lifeless body was found, a memorial stele has stood since 2007, depicting the flight of a pair of doves, created by sculptor Mario Rosati.
On Sunday, November 2, a commemoration was held for the fiftieth anniversary of the intellectual’s death, organized by the Centro Habitat Mediterraneo of the Lipu in Ostia, the Pier Paolo Pasolini Literary Park, and Rosati himself.
At the foot of the stele, a laurel wreath was laid by Roma Capitale, represented by the City Councilor for Culture, Massimiliano Smeriglio. Welcoming the municipal delegation were Alessandro Polinoro, president of Lipu, and Franca Vannini of the Foce del Tevere Community. The ceremony was accompanied by readings of texts and poems.
Also present were two of the ragazzi di vita, those young men whom Pasolini had portrayed in his extraordinary works: Silvio Parrello, known as Pecetto, and Paolo Pilato, known as Tarzanetto. Both reiterated once again that the truth about that night is far from established and that they do not believe the official account. A judicial truth, therefore, that appears fragile and unconvincing regarding the killing of one of the greatest—perhaps the greatest—Italian intellectuals of the twentieth century.
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS ON PASOLINI
PIER PAOLO PASOLINI, WHO DEFIED HIS TIME AND STILL DOES
LATEST 5 CONTRIBUTIONS
SUICIDES IN UNIFORM: THE UNSEEN DISTRESS AND THE WEIGHT THAT KILLS
A HISTORIC TURNING POINT: LAW 181/2025 RECOGNIZES THE SPECIFIC NATURE OF FEMICIDE
PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE IN DIGITAL RELATIONSHIPS – Deborah Breda
AFRICA: THE CONTINENT THAT SCREAMS AND THE WORLD THAT DOESN’T LISTEN
ONE PLANET, ONE HEALTH: ITALY ACCELERATES ITS ONE HEALTH VISION
Ethica Societas is a free, non-profit review published by a social cooperative non.profit organization
Copyright Ethica Societas, Human&Social Science Review © 2025 by Ethica Societas UPLI onlus.
ISSN 2785-602X. Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0