When dissent becomes heresy and women turn fear into civic consciousness
Abstract: In a theocracy, power is not grounded in democratic consent but in a transcendent form of legitimation that tends to remove authority from citizens’ oversight. Within this framework, politics is absorbed into doctrine, and dissent can be interpreted as heresy—turning criticism into moral guilt and protest into a crime. Yet the history of authoritarian regimes shows that stability depends not only on force, but on the monopoly of two resources: narrative and fear. When fear begins to crack, stability becomes merely apparent. Contemporary Iran is experiencing a structural tension between a rigid theocratic system and a young, hyperconnected society, where the demand for dignity and freedom can no longer be postponed. The protests that erupted after the death of Mahsa Amini revealed a profound cultural transformation, led especially by women: civil disobedience linked to the veil is not an aesthetic gesture, but a political act that challenges the State’s jurisdiction over the body and identity. The Iranian case thus emerges as a global laboratory in which human rights, gender equity, and civic participation collide with a model of power that tends to respond to modernity with coercion.
Keywords: #Iran #Theocracy #HumanRights #Freedom #Dissent #Heresy #Repression #SocialMovements #WomanLifeFreedom #MahsaAmini #CivilDisobedience #GenderEquality #Patriarchy #HyperconnectedSociety #RuleOfLaw #OHCHR #AmnestyInternational #HumanRightsWatch #EthicaSocietas #SocialSciences #EllaGrimaldi #EllaClafiriaGrimaldi #EthicaSocietas #EthicaSocietasMagazine #ScientificJournal #SocialSciences #ethicasocietasupli
Ella Clafiria Grimaldi: a medical doctor in Rome, she combines her medical profession with an intense cultural and social commitment. She writes poetry as a form of inner reconstruction and a means of collective awareness-raising. She is the founder and president of the “Insieme per l’Arte” Committee, which promotes events aimed at safeguarding cultural heritage and addressing social issues. A published and award-winning author, she has received recognition from institutional bodies for her artistic contribution. She is also active and deeply engaged in the field of equal opportunities.
Theocracy and the right to freedom (power as an absolute)
In a theocracy, power does not arise from the social contract nor is it based on consent. It demands obedience by proclaiming itself a transcendent authority, beyond human judgment. Within this ideological framework, politics is absorbed into doctrine: any criticism may be perceived not as an act against the State, but against religion itself; consequently, dissent tends to turn into heresy and protest into moral guilt or a crime against the religious order (Arendt, 1951; Human Rights Watch, 2025).
When the legitimization of power is shifted onto an absolute plane, accountability toward citizens weakens and repression risks becoming the “ordinary” language of control. In this context, repression is no longer an “excess”: it becomes a method of governance (Amnesty International, 2024/2025; OHCHR, 2025). It is within this framework that one can understand why, in Iran, the management of dissent has often been described by international observers as severe, both in judicial terms and in matters of internal security (Amnesty International, 2024/2025; Human Rights Watch, 2025).
Authoritarian regimes: controlling narrative and fear
History shows a recurring pattern: systems that appear monolithic may contain within themselves the premises of their own crisis. Many studies on authoritarian regimes and collective movements highlight that power tends to endure as long as it controls two decisive factors: narrative and fear.
When fear loses its social monopoly, stability becomes more fragile and the fracture can emerge rapidly (Tarrow, 2011; Tilly & Tarrow, 2015).
This process is not linear. It is a profound social dynamic in which hope, identity, and cultural resistance intertwine. The Iranian protests associated with the slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” have also been interpreted as a complex phenomenon, where political, symbolic, and generational dimensions overlap (Esfandiari, 2023; Khorramrouz et al., 2023).
Contemporary Iran: a modern society within a rigid structure
Today’s Iran lives a contradiction: a rigid theocracy attempts to control a modern, young, and hyperconnected society. Instruments of repression and moral control—courts, morality police, censorship—are increasingly in tension with the need for participation and dignity, especially in the presence of a digital circulation of information that makes it harder to isolate consciences (Khorramrouz et al., 2023; Human Rights Watch, 2025).
According to Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, Iranian authorities maintain systematic control over civil and political freedoms, restricting fundamental rights and punishing dissidents and protesters (Amnesty International, 2024/2025; Human Rights Watch, 2025). The UN, through the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, has also drawn attention to practices of surveillance, repression, and restrictions impacting fundamental rights (OHCHR, 2025).
Mahsa Amini and the point of no return
The protests following the death of Mahsa Amini (2022) represented a symbolic and political turning point: not merely a street event, but an accelerator of collective awareness, also through the role of symbols and pop culture (Amnesty International, 2024/2025; Time, 2022).
From this perspective, freedom is not only a political concept: it is an anthropological and civic demand that intensifies when a society reaches higher thresholds of awareness and public expression (Tarrow, 2011; Tilly & Tarrow, 2015).
Iranian women: civil disobedience as a political language
Women have become the beating heart of this transformation. In Iran, the female body has historically been one of the main instruments of social and symbolic control: the imposition of the veil has also functioned as a political sign of discipline and belonging, not only as a religious prescription (Nasseri, 2024).
In this context, removing the veil in public is not an aesthetic provocation: it is a gesture of radical political dissent. Every act of civic disobedience becomes an affirmation of autonomy and a rejection of the State’s jurisdiction over one’s own person (Nasseri, 2024).
The women-led mobilization has evolved into a generational movement that transcends gender: it has also involved family and community networks, showing how protest can become a shared cultural infrastructure (Esfandiari, 2023; Nasseri, 2024).
The limits of repression: you can control space, not conscience
Repression can restrict public places and physical spaces, but it can hardly extinguish an idea already rooted in people’s minds. In the literature on social movements, cultural change often precedes institutional change: symbolic obedience breaks first, and then political order weakens (Tarrow, 2011; Tilly & Tarrow, 2015).
When a community loses its reverential fear toward absolute authority, the theocratic leadership loses part of its cultural legitimacy. At that point, coercion becomes more visible and often more costly even for those who govern (Arendt, 1951; Human Rights Watch, 2025).
Beyond reforms: Iran as a laboratory of modernity
Today, many interpretations suggest that it is no longer about demanding gradual reforms, but about recognizing a deeper fracture between society and the model of power. This is a rupture that concerns the very way authority is perceived: when power loses cultural legitimacy, its endurance increasingly depends on coercion, with growing costs in terms of consent and credibility (Arendt, 1951; Human Rights Watch, 2025).
It is no longer a call for reforms. It is the realization that the system is too tight a garment for a nation that wants to breathe the future.
In this perspective, Iran is not only a geopolitical case: it is a laboratory of social transformation where universal human rights, collective identity, gender equity, and civic participation intertwine (Amnesty International, 2024/2025; OHCHR, 2025).
The eclipse of patriarchy and the resilience of a people
This process is not only about burned veils or hair cut in public squares. It is also the manifestation of a crisis of an entire system of values and hierarchies: women’s protest has opened a deeper redefinition of the relationship between power, identity, and rights (Nasseri, 2024).
The change underway shows that submission lasts only as long as fear lasts. When fear is cracked by dignity and shared disobedience, the imposed order loses its grip (Tarrow, 2011).
Tomorrow’s Iran is already written in the gestures of those who, today, refuse to be invisible. Freedom is not granted: it is conquered. And when a society decides to reclaim its destiny, no dogma—however ancient—can withstand it for long (Arendt, 1951; Tilly & Tarrow, 2015).
When the sky becomes a prison, the earth begins to tremble.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES:
Amnesty International. (2024/2025). Amnesty International Report 2024/25: Iran.
Arendt, H. (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt.
Esfandiari, G. (2023). Iran’s uprisings for “Women, Life, Freedom”: Over-determination, crisis and revolt. SAGE Journals.
Human Rights Watch. (2025). World Report 2025: Iran.
Khorramrouz, A., Dutta, S., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2023). For Women, Life, Freedom: A participatory AI-based social web analysis of a watershed moment in Iran’s gender struggles. arXiv.
Nasseri, D. (2024). Iranian women’s movement: Political opportunities and new forces. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 25(2).
OHCHR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights). (2025). Reports/communications on the human rights situation in Iran.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious Politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Time. (2022). How “Baraye” became the anthem of Iran’s protests. Time Magazine.
LATEST 5 CONTRIBUTIONS ON GEOPOLITICS
IRAN: REPRESSION AND THE CRISIS OF THE SOCIAL CONTRACT
IRAN, THE TIDE OF PROTEST CHALLENGING CLERICALISM
RAID IN VENEZUELA: THE USA CAPTURE MADURO AND HIS WIFE TO PUT THEM ON TRIAL
THE IDENTITY-FORMATIVE FUNCTION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE RUSSO-UKRAINIAN CONFLICT
WHAT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SAYS ABOUT OUR MAGAZINE
LATEST 5 CONTRIBUTIONS
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION IN THE JUSTICE REFORM: INTERVIEW WITH GIUSEPPE BELLELLI
THE ALGORITHM THAT WANTS US SAD: WHEN SOCIAL MEDIA CRASH YOUNG PEOPLE’S EMOTIONS
ENLISTING TO BELONG, DYING TO FEEL NOTHING
HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE AND CONTEMPORARY ANTISEMITISM
ONLY IF YOU SCREAM LOUD ENOUGHT: A FLAWED REFORM OF ITALIAN SEXUAL VIOLENCE LAW
Ethica Societas is a free, non-profit review published by a social cooperative non.profit organization
Copyright Ethica Societas, Human&Social Science Review © 2026 by Ethica Societas UPLI onlus.
ISSN 2785-602X. Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0